Rethink Using Your ERP for Asset Management — Part 2 of 2
In last last blog, we talked about the difference between ERP and EAM solutions in Acquire, Deploy, and Manage. Here we continue to explore the differences in these two types of solutions
Reporting on the other hand is important for any organization. While desired reports will vary, your system should have the ability to generate canned reports, while also offering Ad hoc reporting.
For canned reports, can users create new reports on their own? What formats can you export to and how easy is it get these reports to the people who need them?
A good asset management software system gives users the ability to create/modify reports and should be easily exportable to excel, or CSV. Furthermore, having the ability to email reports directly from the system is a major plus.
For ad hoc reporting, users should have unlimited filters they can configure so that finding the desired assets or group of assets is as easy as possible. Once found, users should once again be able to export to the desired format.
When it comes to the end of an asset’s lifecycle, users should be able to easily remove the item from their inventory and denote that the item is retired. This seems simple enough but for many organizations, identifying how an asset was retired and ensuring the correct business process was followed is a must. For example, if selling a laptop, was the software uninstalled, has all data been scrubbed, has the laptop been destructed? Is there an audit trail to review who and when the item was prepped for disposal?
A proper EAM system will have configurable workflows so that organizational business rules are woven into the system. Users are guided step-by-step through each process, data validation rules ensure records are complete and accurate, and system administrators have complete visibility of transactions: asset history reports should show transaction date + time stamp, old value archived, new value recorded, user name noted. Creating accountability is crucial for asset management.
Pre-Integrated Admin Tools
ERP’s are notoriously inflexible systems. This means that if you want to make a change you have to reach out to the vendor, invest more money, and then wait (typically a long turnaround) for them to make the changes to the system.
According to survey results compiled in an IDC White Paper, “The average annual costs of maintaining ERP systems and meeting changing business needs are up to $1.2 million, but in the extreme, they can exceed $4.1 million per year.”
These additional investments can be detrimental to an organization, especially when change is the only constant. The White Paper went on to say, “As we’ve moved from an industrial economy — built on repeatability of process over flexibility — to an information-driven economy, the need for quick adaptability and flexibility in processes is business critical. The pace of business change has accelerated, yet most IT systems remain difficult to modify and change to meet these new business and technical requirements.”
The reality is enhancing and updating the ERP system generally requires 3rd party assistance or dedicated staffing. This is almost always expensive, and rarely addresses the needs of team members responsible for managing the lifecycle of the asset inventory. Modern asset management software is designed to be highly flexible – giving stakeholders the ability to independently and without expense make necessary changes on their own. Asset managers are at a disadvantage when their system does not enable them to: customize role permissions; add, remove, or replace fields throughout the system; and easily create reports and notifications. Having these capabilities off the shelf will save the organization a significant amount of time and money in the long run.
Best of Both Worlds
In many aspects ERP’s are very useful tools and when it comes to financials some would argue they are second to none. For many, integrating an EAM with an ERP is the most ideal situation for asset management. This was the case for Connecticut State Colleges and Universities (CSCU). In less than 10 months, E-ISG transitioned 17 colleges and universities from their legacy asset management systems to the eQuip! Enterprise Asset Management system. To improve record creation and reconciliation efficiency, E-ISG integrated eQuip! with CSCU’s ERP, Banner (You can learn more about that implementation and integration here).
Having a tight integration will allow the financial information to flow to the EAM and the lifecycle information to flow to the ERP – thus providing users from every department with the tools and information they need day-to-day.
When we look at asset management in this light, it’s easy to see that ERP’s and EAM’s are not competitors but rather partners. If an organization wants users to efficiently and accurately manage their assets, they need to realize this paradigm and begin to utilize both systems to acquire desired results.